Innocentive Case Study Analysis Format

Type

Private company
IndustryCrowdsourcing, Cloud Labor, Open innovation, R & D, innovation management, product development
FoundedIndianapolis, Indiana (2001)
HeadquartersWaltham, Massachusetts, US

Key people

  • Craig Jones (Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer)
  • Alpheus Bingham (Founder and Board of Directors member)
ProductsInnovation management, inducement prize contest, crowdsourcing, open innovation
WebsiteInnoCentive.com
http://www.innocentive.com/

InnoCentive is an open innovation and crowdsourcing company with its worldwide headquarters in Waltham, MA and their EMEA headquarters in London, UK. They enable organizations to put their unsolved problems and unmet needs, which are framed as ‘Challenges’, out to the crowd to address[1]. In the case of InnoCentive, the crowd can either be external (i.e. their network of over 380,000 problem solvers) or internal (i.e. an organization’s employees, partners or customers). Awards, typically monetary, are given for submissions that meet the requirements set out in the Challenge description. The average award amount for a Challenge is $20,000 but some offer awards of over $100,000[2]. To date, InnoCentive have run over 2,000 external Challenges and over 1,000 internal Challenges[3], awarding over $20 million dollars in the process[2].

History[edit]

The idea for InnoCentive came to Alpheus Bingham and Aaron Schacht in 1998 while they worked together at Eli Lilly and Company during a session that was focused on exploring application of the Internet to business. The company was launched in 2001 by Jill Panetta, Jeff Hensley, Darren Carroll and Alpheus Bingham, with majority seed funding from Eli Lilly and Company. Darren Carroll led the launch effort and became the first CEO[4].

In 2005, InnoCentive was spun out of Eli Lilly with investments led by Spencer Trask of New York. In December 2006, shortly after Dwayne Spradlin took the helm as CEO, the company signed an agreement with the Rockefeller Foundation to add a non-profit area designed to generate science and technology solutions to pressing problems in the developing world. Between 2006 and 2009, The Rockefeller Foundation posted 10 challenges on InnoCentive with an 80% success rate.[5]

In 2006, Prize4Life partnered with InnoCentive to launch the $1 million ALS Biomarker Prize, which was a Grand Challenge designed to find a biomarker to measure the progression of ALS – also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease – in patients. In February 2011, the $1 million prize was awarded to Dr. Seward Rutkove for his creation and validation of a clinically viable biomarker. In early 2011, InnoCentive launched four more Grand Challenges on behalf of Life Technologies.[4]

In February 2012, InnoCentive acquired UK-based OmniCompete.[6]

Products and services[edit]

Premium Challenges[edit]

Premium Challenges allow organizations to post their problems and needs to InnoCentive’s problem solver network through the InnoCentive.com platform. Typically this process begins with a workshop led by InnoCentive in which appropriate problems and needs are identified. InnoCentive’s PhD-educated Challenge Experts then work with clients to decompose and formulate the problem or need as a Challenge. The problem or need is abstracted to allow for insights across industries, perhaps even one that shares the problem and has already solved it[7]. The Challenge description clearly defines the problem or need, the solution and Intellectual Property requirements, and the award amount that will be paid out for winning submissions.

Challenges are posted, anonymously if the client desires, on InnoCentive.com. Typically users will submit their solutions over a period of 30 to 90 days. Deliverables vary depending on the type of Challenge and can range from short proposals to experimentally validated solutions[8]. After the client has finished evaluating the submissions and selecting the winners, InnoCentive handles the administration of award payments and IP transfers or licensing[7].

Custom Challenges[edit]

Custom Challenges come in two forms: Grand Challenges, which are high profile Challenge programs that focus on a large problem, often calling for radical innovations and breakthrough solutions, and Showcase Challenges, which tend to focus on a specific sector and typically involve a live event[9].

InnoCentive@Work[edit]

InnoCentive is a SaaS-based open innovation platform that allows organizations to run private, internally focused Challenge programs that engage their employees, partners or customers. The platform can be customized and branded as required. Employees are able to comment and vote on their colleagues’ ideas, suggest ideas for Challenges, and participate in discussions on suggested Challenges and awarded submissions. The awards mechanism works slightly differently to Premium Challenges, tying into the organisation’s existing benefits program, for example.[10].

User base[edit]

As of September 2017, there were over 380,000 users from nearly 200 countries in InnoCentive's problem solver network[3]. All users have separately and specifically registered with InnoCentive and report expertise in a variety of fields including chemistry, life sciences, engineering, statistics, information technology, food and crop science and business[7]. Nearly 60% are educated to Masters Level or above[7]. InnoCentive have a number of partnerships that allow their clients access millions more users[11].

Success rates[edit]

In 2016, 80% of Premium Challenges were awarded[7].

A study conducted by Forrester Consulting found that‘the hygiene and health company Essity received a Return on Investment of 74% with a payback period of less than 3 months from their work with InnoCentive[12]. Another study conducted by Forrester Consulting found that Syngenta achieved a return on investment of 182% with a payback period of less than 2 months[13].

See also[edit]

References[edit]

External links[edit]

 

you compare the use of collaboration on the InnoCentive@Work program that Seekers can usefor their internal employees, collaboration usually works well. This is because the people in theworkforce are all working toward a goal that they are cognizant of (and paid salaries), whileSolvers on the InnoCentive website are not told who the Seekers are, nor how Seekers will usethe solutions and contribute to society. This anonymity makes independent competition thebest method for most projects on at InnoCentive.While Competition is the easiest way to get the most solutions from a diverse group of people,it is not to be said that InnoCentive should not support its Solver community more.On February 25, 2010, InnoCentive launched a discussion forum for Solvers to connect with oneanother, learn more about InnoCentive and exchange information about open innovation.Some Solvers have used this as a platform to suggest collaboration on a certain case and willleave their contact information, but not very many people respond to these threads becausethe forum is somewhat off the beaten path of the My IC page.One Solver, appropriately named

typecynic

responded to a post titled “Understanding theProblem” saying:“

Good luck getting an answer for your question. Everything on here is geared for theseeker and the solver is left in limbo regarding his or her work. Don't waste your timegoing into a lot of detail because if your solution doesn't fit what the seeker wants tohear, it will just be rejected with little or no explanation. And since you never get to seethe winning or competing entries, you have no way to learn how to improve your nextsubmittal.”

Another major issue that Solvers voiced was regarding the Project Rooms, which hold the moredetailed descriptions of the Challenge, but Solvers must sign an agreement before entering.Every time a Solver does this, the Challenge is registered in My IC, whether or not they actuallywant to solve it, and furthermore raise the tally of Solvers “working” on the project sometimesinto the hundreds. Solver

Fredrenner 

says

that a distinction is needed between those interested insolving the Challenge, and those just taking a gander at the case specs. “Huge numbers in roomsstrongly discourage me from putting any of my time into a Challenge even if it really interests me.”

Since the forum was created less than 40 posts have been made, signaling that this might notbe the best way to achieve a Solver Community. A chatroom could work in that regard, whereSolvers can give and take instant feedback regarding cases, set up teams for projects that allowfor collaboration and overall establish a sense of belonging in the community. A chatroomwould only work if everyone agreed before entering that anything shared inside is free game,and therefore be warned not to divulge too valuable of ideas without considering its audience.Finally, my last recommendation would be to also create unique Solver Profile Pages where

0 Thoughts to “Innocentive Case Study Analysis Format

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *